Bombay High CourtWP/4050/2015rejected at admission stage

Kusumbai Murlidhar Bhosale v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil P. Deshmukh3 pages

{1} drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3957 OF 2015 Yashwant Motiram Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. I. S. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V. G. Shelke, AGP for respondent State Mr. P. S. Shendurnikar, Advocate for respondents No.4 and 5 .......

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4050 OF 2015 Kusumbai Murlidhar Bhosale PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. I. S. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V. G. Shelke, AGP for respondent State Mr. V. B. Anjanwatikar h/f Mr. A.V.Hon, Adv for R-4 and 5 .......

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4052 OF 2015 Ravindra Vikram Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. I. S. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V. G. Shelke, AGP for respondent State .......

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4159 OF 2015 Hiraman Malji Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. I. S. Thorat, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. V. G. Shelke, AGP for respondent State .......

{2} WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4190 OF 2015 Youraj Sajan Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. Paresh B. Patil, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for respondent State .......

[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] DATE : 29 th APRIL, 2015 ORDER :

1.

In view of advanced stage of election wherein save and except polling all other stages are over, I refrain from entertaining the writ petitions, which apparently give rise to factual questions. Additionally, having regard to the decision of the Apex Court in "Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugdha utpadak Sanstha and another V. State of Maharashtra and others" (2001) 8 SCC 509, I am not inclined to intervene in the matters at this stage.

2.

Writ petitions, as such, are not being entertained and are being rejected.

3.

It is, however, open for the petitioners to take appropriate proceedings at appropriate stage before appropriate forum,

{3} including election petitions.

4.

Pending civil applications stand disposed of. [SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.] drp/B14/wp3957-15