← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6269/2023delay condonatedrejected

Jankabai Sakharam Navle v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector, Jalna And Others

2023-12-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker2 pages

96-CA-6269-23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 96 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6269 OF 2023 IN FAST/10342/2023 JANKABAI SAKHARAM NAVLE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kakde Shubham Madhavrao AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : Ms. M.L. Sangit ...

CORAM :ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE :04.12.2023 P.C. :

A] ORDER IN APPLICATION FOR DELAY 1] Heard.

2] The first appeal is filed along with application for condonation of delay of 2191 days.

3] Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is poor agriculturists and his land is compulsorily acquired. He further submits that the applicant would not claim interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period.

4] Learned AGP has strongly opposed the application for condonation of delay.

96-CA-6269-23 5] Heaving heard the learned counsel for the parties, I deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 2191 days in filing the first appeal, subject to condition that the applicant would not be entitled to interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period.

7] The civil application stands disposed of.

B] ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL 1] The first appeal is admitted.

2] On admission, the learned AGP waives service of notice for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

3] Call R. & P.

4] Office objections, if any to be removed with a period of four (04) weeks from today [ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE S.P.Rane