Navjeevan Dyan Sevabhavi Sansthan Through Its President Digambar Sakharam Dornapalla v. Rashtra Bhasha Prachar Samiti Gyan Mandal Through Its Registrar And Another

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD _____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders | ______________________________________________________ 10 WRIT PETITION NO.4033 OF 2016 KRUSHNA FOUNDATION SHIRPUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT RAVINDRA MAHARU PATIL

VERSUS

RASHTRA BHASHA PRACHAR SAMITI GYAN MANDAL THROUGH ITSREGISTRAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner :Mr.U R Awate Advocate for R.No.1: Mr.D Y Kumbhare.

...

and 11 WRIT PETITION NO.4035 OF 2016 NAVJEEVAN DYAN SEVABHAVI SANSTHAN THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT DIGAMBAR SAKHARAM DORNAPA

VERSUS

RASHTRA BHASHA PRACHAR SAMITI GYAN MANDAL THROUGH ITSREGISTRAR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Petitioner :Mr.U R Awate Advocate for R.No.1: Mr.D Y Kumbhare.

...

CORAM:S.S.SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

Dated: MAY 02, 2016 ...

PER COURT :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the

learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 has filed reply of respondent No.1. In the said affidavit, it is stated that, Respondents are ready to conduct the examination of additional students subject to the eligibility of the candidates and compliances to be made. If the petitioners show compliance therewith, students with petitioners shall thereafter be examined by the Respondents. The petitioners need to prove that they have completed the regular academic cycle of the students and students are eligible to take the examinations. The petitioners also need to pay the required programme fee of the students as per current guidelines of the Respondent, which includes student's registration fee, programme fee and examination fee.

3.

In response to the reply filed by Respondent No.1, the learned counsel appearing for petitioner, on instructions, submits that, the compliance stated in the said affidavit will be complied with on or before 8th May, 2016 by the petitioner.

4.

In the light of above, the respondents shall find out whether students admitted by the petitioners are eligible for examination and if students are eligible arrange to hold their examination as alleged in the affidavit in reply.

5.

With these directions, keeping all rival contentions open, we dispose of both the Petitions. No costs.

Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this order.

(SANGITRAO S.PATIL, J) (S.S. SHINDE, J) kadam/