Pallavi Yogendra Ladkat v. Yogendra So Jagannath Ladkat
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 964 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2025 Pallavi Yogendra Ladkat
VERSUS
Yogendra So Jagannath Ladkat ...
Mr. Virendra Baburao Kale, Advocate for Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J.
DATE : 3rd OCTOBER 2025.
PC :- 1.
Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant. 2.
Inspite of the notice, none for the respondent. 3.
This application is filed by the applicant-wife seeking transfer of the matrimonial proceedings bearing Petition A 53 of 2025 pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Pune to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad.
4.
It is stated that she is residing at Aurangabad with her old age parents. He distance between two places is around 250 k.m. She thus
( 2 ) finds it difficult to attend the Court at Pune as there is no one to accompany her to travel to Pune. There is a proceeding bearing PWDVA No.144/205 under Section 12 of the D. V. Act, pending in the Court of learned JMFC at Aurangabad. He thus prays for allowing the application.
5.
Considering the convenience of the applicant-wife, this Court finds that it would be in the interest of justice to allow the application. Hence, the following order:-
ORDER
(i) Misc. Civil Application is allowed.
(ii) The proceedings of Petition A 53 of 2025 pending before the learned Judge, Family Court, Pune stands transferred to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court at Aurangabad. (iii) After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. In case the Trial Court finds that the adjournments are unnecessarily sought, the Trial Court may deal
( 3 ) with such application, so as to compensate the respondenthusband, if he personally remains present. (iv) If the husband makes a prayer to appear through video conferencing, such prayer be considered liberally by the Trial Court.
(v) With this, Misc. Civil Application stands disposed off. [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]