← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5448/2013admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Shankar Radhu Naikwadi Lrs Vinayak And Others v. Tahsildar Akole And Others

2022-02-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil2 pages

1 CA / 5448 / 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5448 OF 2013 IN SA/6/2008 SHANKAR RADHU NAIKWADI LRS VINAYAK AND OTHERS

VERSUS

TAHSILDAR AKOLE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Wani Girish V.

AGP for Respondent no. 1 to 4 : Mr. B.V. Virdhe Advocate for respondent no. 5 : Mr. A.A. Joshi h/f. Mr.S.V. Natu ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 21 FEBRUARY 2022 PC :

This is an application for setting aside the abatement with request to condone the delay occasioned in seeking such order as against the respondent no. 6-a.

2.

Heard.

3.

Though the proposed LRs of respondent no. 6-a have been duly served, none has appeared.

4.

Considering the nature of the dispute coupled with the request mentioned in the application, application is allowed. 5.

Delay is condoned. Abatement is set aside and the legal representatives of respondent no. 6-a are allowed to be brought on record. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.

2 CA / 5448 / 2013 6.

After such amendment is carried out, issue notice to the persons to be added as respondent no. 6-a's legal representatives, returnable within four weeks thereafter.

[ MANGESH S. PATIL ] JUDGE arp/