Abdul Shakur Maheboobsab Qureshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 925 to 927 sr.no.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 925 CONT. PETITION NO. 270 OF 2016 IN FA/2885/2013 HANMANT MANOHAR CHAUDHARI(WARIK) AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Vikas S. Tanwade AGP for Respondents: Mr. B.V. Virdhe WITH 926 CONT. PETITION NO. 271 OF 2016 IN FA/2838/2013 MANOHAR KRISHNA CHAUDHARI (WARIK)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vikas S. Tanwade AGP for Respondents: Ms. S.S. Raut WITH 927 CONT. PETITION NO. 272 OF 2016 IN FA/2887/2013 ABDUL SHAKUR MAHEBOOBSAB QURESHI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vikas S. Tanwade AGP for Respondents: Mr. A.M. Phule ...

CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATED : 13th JUNE, 2018.

Order :- 1.

When the matter is called out, no one else turned up on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 Acquiring Body submits that the entire decretal amount has already been deposited by the acquiring body and nothing remained to be deposited for satisfaction of the impugned judgment and award.

2 925 to 927 sr.no. 2.

In view of submission on behalf of acquiring body, there would not be any propriety to keep the present petitions alive. Hence, the contempt petitions stand disposed of. No costs. [ K. K. SONAWANE ] JUDGE grt.