Sayyed Moinuddin S/O. Sayyed Saifoddin v. Pratapsing S/O. Narsingh Kakarwal And Another

2024:BHC-AUG:18969 915-CA.4247-24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4247 OF 2024 IN RAST/9838/2024 SAYYED MOINUDDIN S/O. SAYYED SAIFODDIN

VERSUS

PRATAPSING S/O. NARSINGH KAKARWAL AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rathod Ramesh T. Advocate for respective Respondent/s : Ms. Shilpa R. Rajput. ...

CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J.

DATE :

22.08.2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the respective learned counsels for the parties. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the delay of 17 days caused in filing review application is not deliberate. The parties were busy in religious ceremonies. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the reasons for delay are not properly explained. There is no substance in the main application. Hence, it may be dismissed. 4.

Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, delay is condoned.

5.

Civil Application stands allowed.

915-CA.4247-24.odt 6.

Delay caused in preferring review application stands condoned.

7.

Office to register the review application.

8.

Learned counsel Ms. Rajput waives service of notice for respective respondent.

9.

Stand over to 25.09.2024.

(S. G. MEHARE, J.) ...

vmk/-