← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6921/2012dismissedrule discharged

Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika Thr Commissioner v. Sayyed Ahmed Hazimiya

2016-04-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1823 OF 2011 Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Malan Kisan Asmar and Others ..RESPONDENTS WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1678 OF 2012 Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika ..RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6921 OF 2012 Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Sayyed Ahmad Hazimiya ..RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7892 OF 2015 Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Shakuntala Vitthal Chabukswar ..RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7897 OF 2015 1 / 3

Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Shakuntala Dadau Padale ..RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8729 OF 2015 Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Smt. Basanti w/o. Kishor Chavan ..RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10569 OF 2015 Ahmednagar Mahanagar Palika, Ahmednagar ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Shivaji Sonyabapu Kadam ..RESPONDENT ....

Mr. P.V. Barde, Advocate for petitioner.

....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 15th APRIL, 2016 ORDER :

1.

This is a motion for speaking to the minutes of the judgment dated 06th April 2016.

2.

Mr. Barde, learned Counsel for petitioner submits that numbers of U.L.P. Complaints mentioned in Paragraph No.6 have to 2 / 3

be replaced by the following numbers alongwith their dates of judgments:- Sr.

No.

Complaint (ULP) No.

Date of Judgment 1.

34/7 09.12.2010 2.

38/7 16.11.2011 3.

47/11 30.1.2012 4.

55/12 12.3.2015 5.

54/12 12.3.2015 6.

25/12 3.12.2015 7.

10/12 20.4.2015 3.

In the light of the above this motion is allowed. Paragraph No.6 shall stand corrected and shall read as under:- "6.

Shri Barde, learned Advocate on behalf of the Corporation has strenuously criticized the impugned judgments of the Industrial Courts delivered in Complaint (ULP) Nos. 37/2007, 38/2007, 47/2011, 55/2012, 54/2012, 25/2012 and 10/2012, which have been filed by the employees."

( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ) 3 / 3