Baburao Topaji Phulpagar v. Syed Rajekhan Chand Saheb And Another

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.2303 OF 2014 (Baburao s/o Topaji Phulpagar Vs. Syed Rajekhan s/o Chand Saheb & anr.) Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's orders Registrar's orders Shri S.K. Chavan, Advocate for applicant Shri K.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent No.2/State .....

CORAM :

A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED :

4th March, 2015.

1.

Heard counsel for the applicant. Respondent No.1 served, is absent. Reasonings recorded by the trial Court vis-a-vis reasonings recorded by the appellate Court need to be reconsidered. There is arguable case. Leave is granted. Application is converted into appeal.

2.

Appeal is admitted.

3.

Paper Book be got prepared.

4.

Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken against the respondent No.1 - accused in the trial Court and brief report of compliance be called.

5.

Learned A.P.P. dispenses with notice for respondent No.2/ State after admission of the appeal. (A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) fmp/cri2303.14