Sanjay Shivaji Garad v. The State Election Commission Through The Commissioner And Others

WP-3858.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3858 OF 2016 Sanjay Shaivaji Garad ...PETITIONER versus The State Election Commission Through the Commissioner and others ...RESPONDENTS .....

Mr. V.D. Patnurkar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent No. 1 Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, AGP for respondents No. 2 to 4 .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.

DATED : 12th APRIL, 2016.

Order :-

1. We have head Mr. Patnurkar, learned counsel for petitioner, Mr. Shelke, learned counsel for respondent - State Election Commission and Mr. Sonpawale, learned Assistant Government Pleader for State -authorities.

2.

We would have entertained the grievance of the petitioner had he approached this Court earlier. Today, all stages in the process of election have concluded, except poll.

3.

In the light of above, no interference is possible at this stage. 4.

Writ Petition, as such, stands disposed of. The petitioner is at liberty to take such steps as would be permissible in law. Sd/- Sd/- [ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] MTK