Dhanraj Shahajirao Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 wp 4196.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4196 OF 2018 Rajpal Nivrutti Boyane .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4197 OF 2018 Narayan Shripati Gavali .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4198 OF 2018 Babita Kishanrao Sabane and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4199 OF 2018 Dhanraj Shahajirao Kamble .. Petitioner

Versus

2 wp 4196.18 The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Mahesh S. Tuar, Advocate for the Petitioner in all matters. Shri P. N. Kutti, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in all matters. Shri Sunil R. Chaware, Advocate for the Respondent No. 5 in all matters.

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 13TH JUNE, 2018.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Heard the learned counsel for respective parties. The learned counsel for respective parties and the learned Assistant Government Pleader are ad-edm that the present matters are covered under the judgment and order of this Court in Writ Petition No. 7256 of 2011 with another connected matter decided under order dated 02nd December, 2013.

2.

In the light of that, we follow the same course. 3.

In view of the decision rendered by the Division Bench, as referred to above, all petitions deserve to be allowed, and the same are accordingly allowed.

4.

The respondents are directed to examine the cases of each of the individual petitioner for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid down for claiming benefits under the ACPS to the

3 wp 4196.18 private aided Government schools under the Government Resolution dated 30th April 1998, as modified from time to time, and if it is found that the petitioners are entitled to claim benefits under the Scheme, and they satisfy the eligibility criteria, the respondents shall extend the benefits to the petitioners. The respondents shall scrutinize the cases of individual petitioners within a period of six months, and extend the benefits to such of the petitioners who are found eligible, as expeditiously as possible preferably, within a period of four months from such scrutiny.

5.

In view of the above, writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

[SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] bsb/June 18