← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5977/2016admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

The Executive Engineer, Latur Minor Irrigation Division, Latur v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2016-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.K. Jadhav3 pages

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Bhosale Tatyasaheb B. AGP for Respondent-State: Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for Respondents-claimants : Mr. V.G. Sakolkar and Mr. H.B. Nandgavale .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 17th JUNE, 2016

-2PER COURT:- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Learned counsel for the respondents-claimants have not contested the applications for condonation of delay, seriously. Thus, for the reasons stated in the civil applications for condonation of delay, the same are allowed. Delay condoned. Applications are disposed of.

3.

Pending the hearing and final disposal of first appeals, there shall be stay to the execution, operation and implementation of the impugned judgment and awards, subject to depositing entire amount under award, within 12 weeks from today, in this Court, failing which the stay granted vide this order shall stand vacated automatically. Civil applications for stay are disposed of.

4.

For the reasons stated in the civil applications for transposition, the same are allowed and disposed of accordingly. 5.

In first appeals, issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 29.7.2016.

-36.

Learned A.G.P. waives notice for respondent-State and Mr. Sakolkar and Mr. Nandgavale, learned counsel, waive notice for respective respondents-claimants.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) rlj/