Appasaheb Kakasaheb Patil v. Smt Abha Shukla And Others

{1} cp389-24.doc drp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.389 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4277 OF 2023 Appasaheb Kakasaheb Patil PETITIONER

VERSUS

Smt Abha Shukla and Others RESPONDENTS .......

Mr. A. S. Hazari h/f Mr. A. B. Chalak, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. A. S. Bajaj, Advocate for Respondent No.3. .......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 18 th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER :

1.

Representation of the Petitioner is considered and his request is rejected by the Respondent, vide order dated 17th September, 2025. Copy of the order dated 17th September, 2025 is marked "X" for the purpose of identification. 2.

Learned Advocate for the Petitioner tried to argue on merits of the said order. We cannot entertain said argument in contempt jurisdiction. If the Petitioner is aggrieved by the said order, the Petitioner may avail appropriate remedy available in law.

{2} cp389-24.doc 3.

In view of compliance of the order, the Contmept Petition is disposed of.

[ SMT. VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/cp389-24.doc