Nandkumar Pundalik Ahirrao And ANR v. Pradipta Maji And ANR

{1} ca779517.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7795 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 11339 OF 2017 Nandkumar Pundalik Ahirrao & others Applicants

Versus

Pradipta Maji & another Respondents Mr. M. M. Bhokarikar, advocate for the Applicants Mr. Vinayak Upadhye, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 28th July, 2022.

PC :

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants (original claimants) and also learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2Insurance Company. Respondent No.1, owner of offending vehicle, despite service of notice by paper publication, remained absent.

The applicants have fled the appeal for enhancement of compensation amount and there is delay of only 103 days. As such, for the reasons stated in the

{2} ca779517.odt application, it stands allowed and the delay of 103 stands condoned.

The appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb