← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5128/2015disposed offdismissed for default

The Executive Engineer Khadak Purna Project Deulgaon Raja And Others v. Madhav Maroti Bangale

2019-03-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

1 935 CA 5128.2015 in FAST 10989.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5128 OF 2015 IN FAST/10989/2015 WITH CA/5129/2015 IN FAST/10989/2015 WITH CA/7823/2018 IN FAST/10989/2015 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KHADAK PURNA PROJECT DEULGAON RAJA AND ORS.

VERSUS

MADHAV MAROTI BANGALE ......

Mr. S.B.Deshpande, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. B.N.Palve, Advocate for R - 1.

......

CORAM : V.L.ACHLIYA, J.

DATE : 19/03/2019 ......

ORAL ORDER :

1.

The applicant/appellant has moved this application seeking condonation of 243 days delay in filing the appeal. 2.

Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned counsel representing the respondents/claimants. 3.

In brief, it is the contention of learned counsel for applicants that the delay caused in filing the appeal was on account of procedural compliance and the same was not deliberate. It is submitted that the applicants have good case to succeed in appeal. In case delay is not condoned, there is likelihood that the meritorious matter

2 935 CA 5128.2015 in FAST 10989.2015 can be likely to be rejected for technical reasons. 4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondents opposed the application with contention that no sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay in filing the application.

5.

Considering the submissions advanced in light of reasons assigned for condoning the delay and as the pleadings made in the application remains unchallenged, I am inclined to allow the application.

6.

The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'A' and 'B'. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered. 7.

Learned counsel for respondents waives notice of appeal for the respondents.

8.

List the appeal for admission on 04/04/2019.

9.

S.O. 04/04/2019.

[V.L.ACHLIYA] JUDGE KNP.