← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4181/2014rejected at admission stage

Vijayanand Giridharrao Darbastwar v. Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad And Others

2016-03-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.R. Bora4 pages

{1}

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4181 OF 2014 Vijayanand Giridharrao Darbastwar Petitioner

Versus

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathawada University and others Respondents Mr.Gaurav L. Deshpande advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.G. Chapalgaonkar advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.V.S. Badakh, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents No.2 to Mr. S.S. Thombre advocate for respondent No.5 _______________ CORAM : R.M. BORDE, & P.R. BORA, JJ Dated : 14th MARCH, 2016.

PER COURT :- The petitioner claims that, by virtue of Government Resolution dated 17.9.2009, the post of Superintendent i.e. Section Officer of the University is removed from category of Class III (Group 'C') and is classified as Class II (Group 'B'), with a view to ensure filling of 50% of the posts by way of direct recruitment. So far as the employees from category of Class III are concerned, under the Standard Code Rules 1984, posts shall have to be filled in by making promotion of the candidates from amongst the relevant category. The petitioner contends that, the

{2} change has been brought into existence post Govt. resolution dated 17.9.2009, which itself is contrary to the Standard Code Rules. The Standard Code Rules, 1984 have been framed in exercise of powers conferred under section 77-A of the University Act of 1974, providing for terms and conditions of services of nonteaching employees of the non-agricultural universities, in the Maharashtra State and of those of the affiliated colleges and recognized institutions, other than those managed and maintained by the State Government and Local authorities.

The petitioner relies upon paragraph III in respect of recruitment, which provides that the appointment to the Senior posts, except those carrying lowest scale of pay in the various Departments of the Universities and the Colleges and like Superintendent, Accountant, Head Clerks, Senior Clerks, Storekeeper, Senior Laboratory Assistants, Senior Assistants, Stenographers, Senior Library Assistants etc.

{3} experience of 3 years in the lowest post.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent University points out that, the post of Superintendent in the University has always been a Class II post, whereas the post of Superintendent in the affiliated colleges is a Class III post. The relevant regulation referred to above contained in the Standard Code, applies to the University and the relevant paragraph of the Code shall relate to affiliated colleges and not the university. The statute framed by Marathawada University, specifically lay down under Appendix I - Category 'B', the post of Superintendent to be a class II post. It has further been demonstrated that, the aforesaid post has been filled in, in the past by maintaining ratio of 50% by direct recruitment and 50% by way of promotion from amongst feeder cadre.

During the recruitment process of 2009, out of six posts of Superintendent, 50% of the posts were earmarked for direct recruitment and 50% were earmarked for promotional pool. Similarly, in the year 2007, out of 14 posts of Superintendent, seven posts were earmarked for direct recruitment, whereas seven posts were prescribed for promotional channel. The advertisement issued in the year 2006 also relates to 6 posts, out of which three were earmarked for direct recruitment and the balance were prescribed for promotional channel.

{4} pointed out that, during the 2003 recruitment process, out of 13 posts, six were earmarked for direct recruitment and seven were prescribed for promotional cadre. Considering the past practice coupled with the relevant provisions contained in the Statute, reasonable conclusion has to be drawn that, the post of Superintendent in the university forms part of Class II (Group 'B') cadre and as such has to be filled in by observing the ratio of 50 : 50 for promotion and for direct recruitment. The petitioner, probably is misguided because of the fact that, the post of Superintendent at the affiliated colleges forms part of Class III cadre (Group 'C') and as is provided in the Code, required to be filled in only by promotion, from amongst in service candidates. For the reasons recorded above, there is no merit in the petition and petition stands rejected.

(P.R. BORA, J) (R.M.BORDE, J) vbd