Vaishali Pravinkumar Paikrao v. Pravinkumar Vithalrao Paikrao

8720.16ca (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8720 OF 2016 IN FCAST/11224/2016 SAU. VAISHALI PRAVINKUMAR PAIKRAO

VERSUS

PRAVINKUMAR VITHALRAO PAIKRAO ...

Mr U. B. Deshmukh, Advocate h/f Mr S. V. Deshmukh, Advocate for applicant;

Ms S. P. Mahajan, Advocate for respondent CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 30th March, 2022 PER COURT:

1.

The applicant/former wife has caused a delay of 588 days in filing the first appeal. Mediation process at the High Court level has failed.

2.

Heard.

3.

For the reasons set out in the application, the delay is condoned. Family Court Appeal (st.) No.11224/2016 stands registered.

4.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 26/04/2022.

8720.16ca (2) The learned Advocate waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent/former husband.

(S. G. DIGE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) sjk