Pralhad Bhau Bonde Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit v. Shri Jagannath Hari Chaudhari

{1} 8 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1986 OF 2016 APPLN/1985/2016 PRALHAD BHAU BONDE GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA

VERSUS

SHRI JAGANNATH HARI CHAUDHARI ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. M.V. Patekar h/f Mr. P.R.Katneshwarkar CORAM : K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE : 24th July, 2017.

PER COURT:

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondent. It has been submitted that the delay of 44 days caused in filing the application seeking leave to present an appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C. was not intentional and deliberate but due to lack of communication. Learned counsel for applicant, therefore, prayed to condone the delay. 2] In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay is hereby condoned. The application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). Registry to take steps for further process and after registration of the application seeking leave to present an appeal under Section 378(4) of Cr.P.C., to list the matter for hearing on 9th August, 2017. [K.K. SONAWANE] JUDGE.

grt/-