← Library
Bombay High CourtFA/746/2006disposed offdismissed for default

Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs, Aurangabad. v. M/S Aurangabad Electricals Ltd And ORS

2017-08-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal3 pages

(1) WP No.746/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 746 OF 2006 Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs Town Centre, N-5, CIDCO, Aurangabad ...

Appellant.

Versus

M/s Aurangabad Electricals Ltd.

A-23, M.I.D.C. Waluj, Aurangabad and others ...

Respondent.

*** Mr. D.S. Ladda, Advocate for the appellant.

Mrs. Charuta S. Deshmukh, Advocate respondent Nos.2 and 3. *** CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

Dated : 24.08.2017.

...

ORAL ORDER :- 1.

By this First Appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 the appellant has impugned the order dated 20.12.2005 passed by CESTAT, Mumbai thereby reducing the penalty

(2) WP No.746/2006 to Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakh).

2.

By an order dated 28.08.2006 while admitting this appeal, the following substantial questions of law were formulated. 1.

Whether the order passed by the learned CESTAT, Mumbai to the extent of reducing penalty to Rs. 10,00,000/- imposed under Section 11-AC is proper and legal?

2.

Whether the learned CESTAT, Mumbai is right in reducing the penalty imposed despite the fact that it was established that the respondent had suppressed the fact with an intent to evade the duty?

3.

Whether the order passed by the learned CESTAT, Mumbai dated 20.12.2005 is bad in law and hence, needs to be quashed and set aside?

3.

Mr. D.S. Ladda, learned Counsel for the appellant invited our attention to the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of Aurangabad Electricals (P) Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad, reported in [ (2011) AIR (SCW) 1435], which petition was filed by the Assessee herein before the Supreme Court. He submits that in view of the said judgment, this First Appeal filed by the Revenue has become infractuous.

(3) WP No.746/2006 4.

First Appeal No. 746 of 2006 is accordingly disposed of as infractuous. No order as to costs.

5.

In view of disposal of First Appeal, the pending Civil Application, if any, stands disposed of.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL ) ( R.D. DHANUKA ) JUDGE JUDGE *** vdd/-