← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8143/2022delay condonatedrejected

Shashikant Rangnath Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Latur And ANR

2023-02-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.8143 OF 2022 IN FAST/10690/2022 WITH CA/8139/2022 IN FAST/10678/2022 WITH CA/8141/2022 IN FAST/10441/2022 WITH CA/8142/2022 IN FAST/10693/2022 WITH CA/8145/2022 IN FAST/10686/2022 WITH CA/8148/2022 IN FAST/10697/2022 SHASHIKANT RANGNATH KULKARNI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, LATUR AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Patil Shashikiran Nandkumar AGP for Respondent/s - State : Mr. A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.Shrirang Shashishekhar Dande ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 15.02.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 5398 days, in all these matters, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as the learned counsel for the Acquiring Body strongly opposed the applications on the ground that there is huge delay of 14 years.

2.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants, the delay of 5398 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay.

3.

Appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

4.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-