Bhagyashree Sanket Deshmukh @ Bhagashree Pandharinath Wagh v. Sanket Prakash Deshmukh

2025:BHC-AUG:36355 ( 1 ) mca121.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2025 BHAGYASHREE SANKET DESHMUKH @ BHAGASHREE PANDHARINATH WAGH

VERSUS

SANKET PRAKASH DESHMUKH Mr. S.S. Wagh, Advocate for the applicant.

CORAM

: KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATE : 18.12.2025 PC :- 01.

Heard learned Advocate for the applicant. Inspite of service of notice for final disposal, none appears for the respondent. This matter is, therefore, taken up with the assistance of learned Advocate for the applicant.

02.

The applicant-wife has approached this Court seeking transfer of proceeding of Marriage Petition No.132 of 2024, pending in the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Vaijapur to the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pimpri, Dist.Pune. It is case of the wife that distance between the two places is about 250 kms. Presently she is residing with her old aged parents. She finds it difficult to travel to Pune for attending the dates, as there is no one to accompany her in the

( 2 ) mca121.25 family. On this count, learned Advocate for the applicant prays to allow this application.

03.

Since the respondent has not appeared inspite of notice, this Court presumes that the respondent has no objection to allow this application.

04.

Considering the above and the points raised in the application, this Misc. Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). After transfer of the proceeding, the applicant-wife shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. If the Trial Court found that the adjournment is unnecessarily sought by the wife, the Trial Court shall pass appropriate orders compensating the husband, if he personally remains present in the Court. If husband makes request to appear through video conferencing, the Trial Court shall consider said request liberally.

[KISHORE C. SANT,J.] snk/2025/Dec25/mca121.25