Shreeyash Pratishthan Aurangabad Through President v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 907-ca-5013-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5013 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2682 OF 2019 Shreeyash Pratishthan, Aurangabad ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and another ... Respondents ....

Mr. A. N. Sabnis, Advocate h/f Mr. Atul M. Karad, Advocate for the applicant.

Ms. G.L. Deshpande, AGP for the State.

....

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ DATED : 26th APRIL, 2019 PER COURT:- 1.

Heard Mr. Sabnis, learned counsel appearing for the applicant and learned AGP for the State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the subsequent events occurred post filing of the petition in the nature of order being passed by the respondents, the applicant is willing to place on record the subsequent events after post filing this petition and no prejudice would be caused to the respondents by bringing on record the subsequent events.

2 907-ca-5013-19.doc 3.

In view of the submissions of the learned counsel and for the reasons stated in the application, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.

4.

The amendment be carried out within a period of one week from today.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE ) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE SMS