← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8599/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Panchfula Rama Shirsath v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sangitrao S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.S. Shinde1 pages

sgp 1 WP8599.2015.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 8599 OF 2015 Sau. Panchfula w/o Rama Shirsath ... Petitioner

VERSUS

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents .......

Mr. R. L. Chintalwar, Advocate for the petitioner Mr S. D. Kaldate, AGP for respondent/State Mr A. N. Gaddime, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 4 ..........

CORAM : S. S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 30th JUNE, 2016.

PER COURT:

.

Mr. Gaddime, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 raises preliminary objection that the petitioner has alternate remedy before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In the light of that, though Mr. Chintalwar, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to canvass the submissions on merits, we are not inclined to consider the same. Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy.

All contentions are kept open. No costs.

[ SANGITRAO S. PATIL ] [ S. S. SHINDE ] JUDGE JUDGE