Shaikh Hameed Shaikh Hyder And ANR v. The State Of Mah And ORS

( 1 ) wp 3766.12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITON NO. 3766 OF 2012 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4144 OF 2016 Shaikh Hameed Shaikh Hyder and another ..

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others ..

Respondents Shri. A. S. Golegaonkar, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri. V. S. Badakh, A.G.P. for Respondent/State. Shri. V. S. Panpatte, Advocate for Respondent No.6. CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATED : 27 th August, 2018 PER COURT:

.

Mr. Golegaonkar, the learned counsel, on instructions, states that the Petitioner No. 1 is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition as he is retired. Liberty may be given to the Petitioner No. 2 to independently challenge the order invalidating the caste claim.

( 2 ) wp 3766.12 2.

In the light of above, as Petitioner No. 1 does not want to prosecute the present writ petition, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn to the extent of Petitioner No. 1. Liberty to Petitioner No. 2 to assail the order as may be permissible in law. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 3.

In view of disposal of writ petition, civil application also stands disposed of.

[ S. M. GAVHANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] ass/wp 3766.12