← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4825/2025disposed off

Nagadnarayan Sevabhavi Sanstha Thr Its President Sandeep Kalyan Ware And Others v. The Union Of India Thr Secretory And Others

2025-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:10768-DB 4825.25wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 WRIT PETITION NO. 4825 OF 2025

1. Nagadnarayan Sevabhavi Sanstha, Chikhali, Tq. Georai, Dist. Beed

2. Dnyandeep Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Chikhali, Tq. Georai, Dist. Beed

3. Rajvaibhav Sevabhavi Sanstha, Tambawa, Tq. Kaij, Dist. Beed

4. Sanjiwani Sevabhavi Sanstha, Jategaon, Tq. Georai, Dist. Beed

5. Balaghat Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Pargaon, Tq. Patoda, Dist. Beed

6. Someshwar Shikshan Sanstha, Beed

7. Sunflowar Sevabhavi Sanstha, Pimparghavan, Beed

8. Rajmata Jijabai Gramin va Shahari Vikas Sevabhavi Sanstha, Chakur, Dist. Latur

9. Samrat Pratishthan Dharur, Dist. Beed

10. Maharana Pratap Missian Pimpri Bk., Tq. Parali, Dist. Beed

VERSUS

1. The Union of India, thr. Secretary, Ministry of Education Department of School Education and Literacy, New Delhi

2. The State of Maharashtra, thr. Secretary, Department of School Education and Sports, Mumbai

3. The Finance Department Government of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Mumbai

4. State of Maharashtra, Directorate of Primary Education, Pune

5. The Education Officer, Primary, Zilla Parishad, Beed ....

Mr D. B. Pokale, Advocate for petitioners Mr R. R. Bangar, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 Ms P. V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4 Mr P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondent No.5 CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 8th April, 2025 PER COURT:

1.

This is a matter of reimbursement of fees in respect of 25% students admitted by the petitioners/institutions under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.

4825.25wp (2) 2.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel Mr Bangar waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.1. Learned A.G.P. waives service of notice on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to 4. Learned advocate Mr Suryawanshi waives service of notice on behalf of respondent No.5. 3.

We have heard both the sides.

4.

We dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to undertake scrutiny of petitioners' proposal independently on their own merits and take appropriate decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of four weeks from today, and if the petitioners are found entitled to get reimbursement, shall disburse the money to them within a period of four weeks thereafter.

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk