Ashok Kanhuji Meghdambar v. The State Of Maharashtra

919,920,922-BA-564,565,585-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO. 564 OF 2022 AND BAIL APPLICATION NO. 565 OF 2022 AND BAIL APPLICATION NO. 585 OF 2022 ASHOK KANHUJI MEGHDAMBAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ....

Mr. V. B. Sargar, Advocate for applicant Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, APP for respondent - State ....

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT, J.

DATED : 25th AUGUST, 2022 PER COURT :- .

After having heard the learned Advocate for the applicant in all the three applications, the Court expressed disinclination to grant relief. It is now informed that the charge has been framed meaning thereby the trial has commenced. 2.

It is, therefore, not desirable to make any observations regarding any merits of the matters. The learned Advocate, therefore, came around to seek withdrawal of all these applications.

(( 2 ))919,920,922-BA-564,565,585-2022 3.

All the applications are disposed of as withdrawn. 4.

If trial could not be concluded within a period of twelve

(12) months, the applicant may revive his request. Needless to mention, the same would be decided on its own merits. 5.

If any other cause arose for the applicant to move for bail before the time frame of twelve (12) months, he may avail the same. [ R. G. AVACHAT, J. ] SMS