← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/1477/2015

Godawari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Latur v. Basavraj Sangappa Belapure And Others

2015-10-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala2 pages

1 ca 1534.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1534 OF 2015 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 10465 OF 2014 Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, Latur .. Applicant

Versus

Mahadeo Gunda Chande and others .. Respondents Mrs. Kalpalata B. Bharaswadkar, Advocate for the Applicant. Mrs. P. G. Sontakke, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1. Shri A. M. Phule, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. WITH C. A. NO. 1487 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11098 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1480 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11122 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1490 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11131 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1477 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11079 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1499 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11082 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1483 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11118 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1493 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11106 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1496 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11110 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1523 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11094 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1474 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11148 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1516 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11090 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1526 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11114 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1503 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11086 OF 2014 C. A. NO. 1509 OF 2015 IN F. A. ST. NO. 11102 OF 2014 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.

DATE : 28TH OCTOBER, 2015.

2 ca 1534.15 PER COURT :

.

Heard Mrs. Bharaswadkar and Mrs. Sontakke, the learned counsel for respective parties. Mrs. Sontakke, the learned counsel opposes the applications on the ground no sufficient cause is stated.

2.

It appears that, the applicant is a corporation. The present applicant was not added as party in the capacity of corporation, but the Executive Engineer of Irrigation Division was added as party. The impugned award is executable against the corporation and it is only after the applicant got the knowledge, the proceedings for obtaining certified copies, legal opinion were taken up.

3.

In the light of the above and for the reasons stated in applications, the applications are allowed. The delay is condoned. The civil applications are disposed of. [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 15