Babasaheb Narayan Markad And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

947CA12659.2019.odt -1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12659 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2019 Rubeena Pravin Chand Pasha Shaikh & Ors.

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5857 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2019 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5858 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2019 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5859 OF 2020 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2019 WRIT PETITION NO. 10910 OF 2019 .....

Mr. R. S. Deshmukh, Sr. Counsel a/w Mr. Sanket A. Jadhav i/b Mr. A. G. Ambetkar, Advocate for the applicants Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State .....

CORAM : C. V. BHADANG & SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 30, 2022 PER COURT : - 1.

Although these applications are filed for intervention, the applicants in these applications want to be co-petitioners in Writ Petition sgp

947CA12659.2019.odt -2No. 10910 of 2019. The petitioners in the said writ petition have no objection for permitting the applicants to be the co-petitioners. 2.

In that view of the matter, the applications are allowed. 3.

The applicants be added as petitioners in Writ Petition No. 10910 of 2019. The amended copy of the petition be served on the learned Counsel for the other side. It would be open for the respondents to file additional affidavit-in-reply, if any, within a period of two (02) weeks.

4.

List the Writ Petition No. 10910 of 2019 after three (03) weeks.

[SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.] [C. V. BHADANG, J.] sgp