← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5252/2020delay condonatedrejected

Gokul Chango Rane (Died) Lrs Girdhar And ORS v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer U.T.P.H. No 1 Jalgaon And ANR

2023-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

1 1080 & 1081 ca 5235-20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1080 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5235 OF 2020 IN FAST/12412/2019 DAULAT SAHADU BHOKRE (DIED) THR LRS SANTOSH

VERSUS

THE COLLECTOR, JALGAON AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. B. K. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. A. B. Dhongade ...

AND 1081 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5252 OF 2020 IN FAST/11267/2019 GOKUL CHANGO RANE (DIED) LRS GIRDHAR AND ORS

VERSUS

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER U.T.P.H. NO 1 JALGAON AND ANR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. K. B. Pawar h/f Mr. A. B. Kale AGP for Respondent No.1: Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr. R. A. Tambe ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED : 31/01/2023.

P. C. :

1.

Heard rival submissions.

2.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. The learned AGP as well as the respective learned counsel for respondent / acquiring body strongly

2 1080 & 1081 ca 5235-20 opposed the applications on the ground that there is also circulation delay.

3.

Considering the statutory right of the applicants, the applications are allowed and the delay periods in all these applications stand condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly.

4.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

5.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) VS Maind/-