Radhabai Tanha Shehare v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

905-CA-5562-2020 to 907

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5562 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 11293 OF 2019 PREMSING TARACHAND MEHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 906 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5598 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 11295 OF 2019 RADHABAI TANHA SHEHARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER AND 907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5600 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 11351 OF 2019 WITH CA/5599/2020 IN FAST/11349/2019 PANDHARINATH BARKU KARE (DIED) THR LRS JANABAI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. D.A. Bide h/f. Mr. V.B. Wayal - Advocate for Applicants Mr. S.N. Kendre, Mr. B.V. Virdhe and Mr. S.P. Tiwari - AGP's for Respondent Nos.1 and 2, State ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 6th July, 2023 PER COURT :

1.

The learned A.G.P. also waives service for respondent No.2 - acquiring body.

Pooja K.

1/2

905-CA-5562-2020 to 907 2.

Heard rival submissions.

3.

The respective applicants are seeking condonation of delay periods mentioned in these applications, which appear to be caused due to their poor financial condition. 4.

The learned A.G.P. strongly opposed the application on the ground that, no reasonable cause is mentioned for condoning the delay periods.

5.

However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and the delay periods mentioned in these applications stand condoned subject to condition that, the applicants shall not claim any interest for the periods of aforesaid delay.

6.

The appeals be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

7.

The applications are accordingly disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2