← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/7736/2010admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Pandurang Bhagwan Naikwade And ANR v. Vithal Limbaji Fatte (Died) Lrs Santosh Vithal Fatte And ANR

2025-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shailesh P. Brahme2 pages

1 962.SA-573-1999.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 962 SECOND APPEAL NO. 573 OF 1999 VITHAL LIMBAJI PHATTE

VERSUS

PANDURANG BHAGWAN NAIKWADE AND ANOTHER .....

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8916 OF 2022 IN SA/573/1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7736 OF 2010 IN SA/573/1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12204 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12240 OF 2022 IN SA/573/1999 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6878 OF 2009 IN SA/573/1999 .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mr.Sandesh Kamble h/f. Mr.S.P.Urgunde Advocate Mr.U.R.Kulkarni and Mr.P.R.Tandale (Both Discharged) Advocate for Respondent :Mr.Shriram V.Deshmukh h/f. Mr.Devang Deshmukh ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 10th JULY 2025 PER COURT :

2 962.SA-573-1999.doc .

It is informed that appearance of Learned counsel Mr.Kulkarni is discharged as he is no more. Learned counsel Mr.Tandale is also discharged.

2.

Parties are ad-idem. Respondent No.2/Vimalbai is no more and Respondent No.1/ Pandurang who is her son, is the only heir. As the Respondent No.1 is already on record though in his personal capacity and the cause of action survives for him to represent Respondent No.2 also.

3.

Parties shall be at liberty to make formal amendment to the memo of second appeal. Matter is ready for final hearing. 4.

List these matters on 11.08.2025, high on board. 5.

Application for early hearing is disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] vsj..