Madhukar Dnyanoba Dandime v. Maharashtra State Industrial Development Corporation, Latur And ORS

{1} ca621316.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6213 OF 2016 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.226 OF 2016 Madhukar s/o Dnyanoba Dandime Applicant

Versus

Maharashtra State Industrial Development Corporation, Latur & others Respondents Mr.G.N. Kulkarni (Mardikar), advocate for the applicant (intervener). Mr.S.S.Dande, advocate for Respondent No.1.

Mr.P.S.Patil, AGP for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : R.M.BORDE & K.L.WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 12th August, 2016 PER COURT:

It is contended that in a suit for partition, decree has been passed in favour of the intervener and he has been held entitled to receive share in the amount of compensation.

It would be open for the intervener to execute the decree and claim the amount, which can be allotted to his share. Intervention in the appeal is not contemplated in law.

Keeping an option open to the intervenor to claim his share in observance of the procedure prescribed under law, Civil Application is disposed of.

K.L.WADANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE adb/ca621316