Dnyanoba Bandoba Supnar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 82 WRIT PETITION NO. 4442 OF 2018 DNYANOBA BANDOBA SUPNAR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Patil Nileshsingh J AGP for Respondents 1 and 2: Mr. P.S.Patil Advocate for Respondents no.3 : Mr.Thoke Dhananjay B. ---- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 8, 2018 O R D E R :

Learned counsel submits that the order is passed for payment of gratuity and interest. Revenue recovery certificate is also issued in the year 2013, however, the Tahsildar is not taking any action. 2.

The petitioner shall point out the property of the sugar factory. The respondent authority shall initiate the process for recovery of the amount as shown in the revenue recovery certificate within three months from today and shall take to its logical end.

wp4442.18 3.

The petitioner shall cooperate in the said proceedings by pointing out the properties of respondent nos. 3 and 4.

4.

Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] dbm