Nida Ahmed Ali Sayyad v. The Union Of India Through Finance Department And Others

17-wp-6140-2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.6140 OF 2023 NIDA AHMED ALI SAYYAD

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS ....

Mr. A. A. Yadkikar, a/w Mr. Akshay Kulkarni, Advocates for Petitioner Ms Nikita Gore, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr S. V. Natu, Advocate for respondent Nos.3 to 5 ....

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE: 12.06.2023.

PER COURT :- 1.

We have heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides.

2.

The learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 bank submits on instructions that unless the petitioner, who is a student, tenders a co-applicant with an acceptable credit score, the bank cannot accept the application of the Petitioner for grant of education loan. The two co-applicants earlier tendered by the

(( 2 )) 17-wp-6140-2023 Petitioner in the two independent applications, are defaulters, in as much, as they do not have an acceptable credit score. 3.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that she would tender a fresh application along with a new co-applicant with an acceptable credit score.

4.

In view of the above, this petition is disposed off with liberty. If the application is in order, the concerned bank may consider the same expeditiously.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] [ RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. ] SMS