The State Of Maharashtra v. Ramesh Fula Pimpale

1 Cri.A.2479.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2479 OF 2014 The State of Maharashtra, Through PI Mr. Somnath Tambe, ACB Dhule ...Applicant versus Ramesh Fula Pimpale, Age: 41 years, Occ.: Service, MSEB, R/o Near Statue of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Chadwel Korde, Tq. Sakri, Dist. Dhule

...Respondent

.....

Mr. K.S. Patil,A.P.P. for Applicant- State Mr. Shrikant S. Patil, Advocate for respondent - Absent. .....

CORAM : A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

DATED : 5th MARCH, 2015 Order :- 1.

When this matter was called out earlier, none was present for respondent- accused, hence, it was kept back. Even, on second call, none is present for respondentaccused. 2.

Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

2 Cri.A.2479.14 3.

The matter relates to Prevention of corruption Act. Considered the reasoning recorded by the trial court and submissions made by learned Additional Public Prosecutor. There is arguable case. As such, leave is granted. 4.

Application be converted into appeal.

5.

Appeal is Admitted.

6.

Paper- book be got prepared.

7.

Action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure be taken against respondent - accused in the trial Court and brief compliance report be called.

( A.I.S. CHEEMA, J. ) MTK