← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/10708/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Shashikant Kishanrao Kulkarni v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-08-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

1 905-WP10708-19+.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 WRIT PETITION NO. 10708 OF 2019 Shashikant S/o Kishanrao Kulkarni .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for Respondents-State.

933 WRIT PETITION NO. 10738 OF 2019 Pandurang S/o Bhagaji Landge .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others .. Respondents Mr. A. A. More, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mrs. G. L. Deshpande, A. G. P. for Respondents-State. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED : 29th AUGUST, 2019.

PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard Mr. More, the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the learned AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. The grievance of the petitioners is that the revenue recovery certificates are issued but the revenue authority are not executing the same.

2.

Hence, we pass the following order :

"I.

In case the revenue recovery certificates in favour of the

2 905-WP10708-19+.doc petitioners are still in force and the properties of respondent No. 4 are not attached or no further steps are taken by any other creditor, then the authorities i.e. respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall execute the revenue recovery certificates in accordance with law expeditiously. The petitioners shall cooperate in showing the properties of the Karkhana movable as well as immovable to enable the authorities to proceed further. We have not laid down any particular time frame, however, it is expected that the authorities shall take expeditious steps to execute the same considering that it is an amount with regard to the gratuity and the petitioners are senior citizens."

3.

Writ Petitions are disposed of. No costs.

( ANIL S. KILOR ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE P.S.B.