Pankaj Ashok Dahale v. Ashwini Pankaj Dahale

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 918 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1570 OF 2024 IN REVNST/4144/2024 PANKAJ ASHOK DAHALE

VERSUS

ASHWINI PANKAJ DAHALE ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ashutosh C. Sisodiya Advocate for Respondent : Ms.Rashmi S. Kulkarni ....

CORAM : ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J.

Dated : December 10, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned Advocate for applicant submits that delay of 129 days caused in filing criminal revision application is not deliberate or intentional. The applicant is a poor and unemployed person and he was unaware about the Law of Limitation. Therefore, he prays for allowing the application. 2.

Learned Advocate for respondent strongly objected for condoning the delay.

3.

For the reasons stated in paragraph nos.4 and 5 of application for condonation of delay, application is allowed. Delay of 129 days caused in filing criminal revision application is condoned. Criminal Revision Application be verified and registered.

4.

List Criminal Revision Application on 11-03-2025. ( ABHAY S. WAGHWASE, J. ) SPT