Rupesh Chintan Giri And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

(1) W.P. No. 4531 of 2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

AURANGABAD BENCH, AT AURANGABAD.

Writ Petition No. 4531 of 2016 District : Latur

1. Rupesh s/o. Chintan Giri, Age : 36 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Vitthal Nagar, in front of Vaibhav Ganesh Temple, Latur.

2. Sandhya d/o. Vilasrao Mane, Age : 30 years, Occupation : Service, R/o. Prakash Nagar, Latur.

.. Petitioners.

versus

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through its Principal Secretary, Sports & Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32.

2. The Deputy Director of Education, Latur Division, Latur.

3. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Latur.

4. Bal Vikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Latur, Taluka & District : Latur, Through its Secretary, Prakash Nagar, Latur, Taluka & District : Latur.

5. The Head Mistress, Shree Sarswati Primary School, Prakash Nagar, Latur, Taluka & District : Latur.

.. Respondents.

............

(2) W.P. No. 4531 of 2016 Mr. R.D. Biradar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Badakh, Asst. Government Pleader, for respondent nos.1 and 2.

............

CORAM : S.S. SHINDE & SANGITRAO S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 18TH APRIL 2016 PER COURT :

Not on board. Taken on board at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioners.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Asst. Government Pleader appearing for respondent nos.1 and 2.

3.

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, on instructions, submit that the representations were made before respondent no.2 in respect of grievance about unpaid salary. However, respondent no.2 has not yet decided the said representations.

4.

We grant liberty to the petitioners to make applications / representations before respondent no.2 within a period of two weeks from today. On filing such applications / representations, respondent no.2 shall consider the grievance of the petitioners and

(3) W.P. No. 4531 of 2016 take appropriate decision after verifying service record of the petitioners. If the petitioners are found eligible for salary, respondent no.2 shall issue necessary directions to respondent no.3 for disbursement of salary. The entire exercise shall be done as expeditiously as possible, however, within a period of six weeks from today.

5.

With the above directions, the Petition is disposed of.

6.

Parties to act upon an authenticated copy of this order.

(SANGITRAO S. PATIL) (S.S. SHINDE) JUDGE JUDGE ..........

puranik / WP4531.16