Mahadu Janaji Bansode v. Uday Choudhari The District Collector Aurangabad And Others

941-CP-460-19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 460 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 845 OF 2016 Mahadu Janaji Bansode ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

Uday Choudhari, District Collector, Aurangabad and Others ..RESPONDENTS ....

Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent - State ....

CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.

DATED : 03rd DECEMBER, 2020 PER COURT :

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, states that the contempt petitioners are ready to deposit the requisite expenses for measurement, its non-deposit according to the respondents is causing hindrance.

2.

In the circumstances, requisite amount be deposited by the contempt petitioners and soon thereafter measurement be carried out and execution be proceeded with.

3.

In view of aforesaid, contempt petition is disposed of. ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. ) ( SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. ) SSD 1 / 1