Shriram Machhindra Bahir v. Prakash Baburao Pawar And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:10165

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 WRIT PETITION NO. 4774 OF 2024 SHRIRAM MACHHINDRA BAHIR

VERSUS

PRAKASH BABURAO PAWAR AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. L H. Kwale h/f Mr.Suryawanshi Kamlakar J. AGP for Respondents-State : Mr. V. M. Chate ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

Dated : May 07, 2024 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner. 2.

The Appellate Court, by the impugned order, has restrained the defendant No.2 from creating third party interest in the suit property. Without deciding the merits of the matter, in the instant case, it is more appropriate to direct the Appellate Court to decide the appeal as expeditiously as possible.

3.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the appeal is ready for hearing.

4.

As such, the Appellate Court to decide the same in accordance with law at the earliest. With above observation, the petition is disposed of. ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.

Page 1 of