Maruti Pundlikrao Satalkar v. Ashok Ganpati Kokate And ORS

{1} 934 sr. no..odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 4886 OF 2009 MARUTI PUNDLIKRAO SATALKAR

VERSUS

ASHOK GANPATI KOKATE AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V. D. Gunale.

Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : Mr. R. J. Godbole & Mr. R. I. Wakade. Advocate for Respondent No.6 : Mr. N. D. Kendre & Mr. U. L. Momale. Advocate for Respondent No.8 : Mr. N. B. Patil. . . .

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. BADAR, JJ.

DATE : 13TH JANUARY, 2016.

PER COURT:

1] We have heard Mr. Gunale for the petitioner, Mr. Godbole, Advocate for the respondent management. It is submitted by Mr. Godbole that the order impugned is already implemented. Vide the impugned order, the recorded management body of the Trust in Schedule I of the PTI was directed to manage the administration and the pending change reports were expedited. Considering the above, writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Rule is discharged.

[A.M. BADAR] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA] JUDGE JUDGE grt/-