← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/6108/2011admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Shivaji Ramji Pawar (Died) Lrs Ramesh Shivaji Pawar And ORS v. Sakharam Mahipatrao Kulkarni Gpa Ashok Sakharam Kulkarni Died Th Lrs And ORS

2015-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade2 pages

-:(1):- FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders.

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6108 OF 2011 IN SA/28/2011 SHIVAJI RAMJI PAWAR (DIED) LRS RAMESH SHIVAJI PAWAR AND ORS

VERSUS

SAKHARAM MAHIPATRAO KULKARNI GPA ASHOK SAKHARAM KULKARNI DIED TH LRS AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shaikh Mujtaba Gulam Mustafa And Mr. A. G. Ansari.

AGP for Respondent No.4: Mr. V. B. Garud.

*** CORAM: T. V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED: 31st August, 2015.

PER COURT:

1.

The application is filed for condonation of delay caused in filing application to bring legal representative of Respondent No.3 on record and for permission to bring legal representatives on record. As per the record, notice was served on Respondent No.3-A but nobody turned up. Respondent No.4 is present. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.4 submits that as per his information the delay of 15 years has been caused in

-:(2):- filing application for bring legal representatives of deceased Respondent No.3 on record. In view of the contents of the application, submissions made and as there is nothing on record to show that about the death of Respondent No.3-A, information was given, it can be said that Respondent No.3 was not available when the first appeal was decided. The suit was decided on 15th December, 2005 and there is possibility that the Respondent No.3 was not available even when the suit was being decided. The entire matter will be considered on the point "what is effect of death of Respondent No.3 on the entire matter in view of the death during pendency of the proceedings". Subject to that decision, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Permission is granted to bring the legal representatives on record. Application is disposed of accordingly. 2.

Notice to Respondent No.3-A made returnable on 1st October, 2015.

3.

Amendment to be carried out immediately.

[T. V. NALAWADE, J.] Dt.31/08/2015 ans/6108