← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4225/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Ganpat Natthu Patil Through Gpa Dinesh Manik Patil v. Jabirkhan Haji Shabbir Khan And Others

2018-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

920-WP-4225-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 WRIT PETITION NO.4225 OF 2018 Ganpat S/o Natthu Patil ... Petitioner.

Versus

Jabirkhan Hazi Shabbir Khan and others ... Respondents.

....

Mr. Prakash V. Balkhande, Advocate for the Petitioner. ....

CORAM : V.L. ACHLIYA, J.

DATED : 25th APRIL, 2018 PER COURT:- 1.

By this petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 14.03.2018 passed in R.C.S. No.83/1996 by Civil Judge, Junior Division, Raver, Dist. Jalgaon. By the impugned order, the trial Court has set aside the order to proceed without cross-examination by defendant nos.15 to 18 subject to payment of cost of Rs.5,000/- to plaintiff. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has preferred this petition. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the impugned order. In my view, the order passed by the trial Court cannot be termed as perverse or without jurisdiction. It is well within the powers of the Court to entertain such application. It is a clear case of exercise of judicial discretion by the Court. In absence of any perversity or error in exercise of jurisdiction, the order impugned calls for no interference in exercise of writ

920-WP-4225-2018 jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India. In this view, I am not inclined to entertain the petition. The petition is dismissed.

3.

In view of the fact that the suit is of the year 1996, the trial Court is directed to expedited the hearing of the case and decide the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order. ( V.L. ACHLIYA ) JUDGE SPR