Shantilal S/O Lakhmichand Baphna v. State Of Maharashtra

951- C.A. No. 8624-2022.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8624 OF 2022 SHANTILAL LAKHMICHAND BAPHNA

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ....

Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. V. D. Latange AGP for Respondent State : Mrs. D. S. Jape ....

CORAM : S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE : 28.06.2022 PER COURT :- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGP for respondent. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that respondent No.1,3,4 and 5 i.e. Chunilal, Kantilal, Popatla and Subhash are died during the pendency of the appeal. Hence ieirs and legal representative of deceased be taken on record. Learned AGP has no objection for it. Considering the reasons mentioned in the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

2.

Appellant to take steps within four weeks.

( S.G. DIGE,) JUDGE ysk