Shaikh Nizam Jainddin And ANR v. The State Of Mah And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 4368 OF 2012 Shaikh Nizam s/o Jainuddin & another Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents.

*** Mr. C.V. Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner. Smt. M.A. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. D.J. Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent No.4. *** CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

Dated :

03-11-2017.

PER COURT :- 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent events that have occurred, the grievance of the petitioners is redressed and this Petition can be disposed of as being infructuous.

2.

Considering the above, this Petition is disposed of as being infructuous.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/