Shahnaj Irshad @ Virshed Shaikh And ORS v. Kiran Kundlik Kadu And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 72 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6473 OF 2022 IN FAST/12273/2021 SHAHNAJ IRSHAD @ VIRSHED SHAIKH AND OTHERS

VERSUS

KIRAN KUNDLIK KADU AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Darandale Abhijit C. Advocate for Respondent No.1 : Mr. Syed B.N. h/f. Mr.Aghav Avinash D.

Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Mr.Ambhore M.M. ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 30.01.2023 PER COURT :

Heard rival submissions. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 162 days which appears to be caused due to their financial crisis. The learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and 2 strongly opposed the application on the ground that there is also circulation delay. However, considering the statutory right of applicants, the delay of 162 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid delay period and also for the delay in circulating the matter belatedly, on the enhanced compensation, if granted. 2.

Appeal be placed for admission after removal of office objections, if any.

3.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE .....

shp/-