Shubham Jalindar Taware v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
2025:BHC-AUG:11826
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 600 OF 2025 Shubham Jalindar Taware
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shekade Shashikant E. APP for Respondents-State: Ms. P. V. Diggikar ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
Dated : April 24, 2025.
PER COURT :- 1.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.
2.
The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No.0249/2024, dated 01/06/2024, registered at Shivaji Nagar Police Station, District Beed, for the offences punishable under sections 323, 324, 326, 327, 34, 427, 504, 506 of IPC.
3.
The learned Counsel points out that this Court, by order dated 19/11/2024 in ABA No.1303/2024 with ABA No.1305/2024, dismissed the application in respect of Applicant No.1 - Pramod Shivajirao Sonawane and Applicant No.2 - Rushikesh Bhagwan Mahakunde. The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the bail applications in respect of Deepak Pandurang Kurhe and Shivaji Kisanrao Sonawane were allowed by this Court. It is further submitted that the case of the present applicant is identical to that of Deepak Kurhe and Shivaji Sonawane.
4.
In view of the above, the application is allowed in the following terms:- i] In the event the applicant is arrested in connection with FIR No.0249/2024, dated 01/06/2024, registered at Shivaji Nagar Police Page 1 of
933 ABA 600-2025 Station, District Beed, for the offences punishable under sections 323, 324, 326, 327, 34, 427, 504, 506 of IPC, he shall be released on bail on furnishing PR bond of Rs.20,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. ii] The applicant shall attend the police station as and when called by the police.
iii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case. iv] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.
5.
In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled. 6.
It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.
7.
The application stands disposed of.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-.
Page 2 of