Rangnath Nivrutti Landge v. Bajaj Auto Limited Bajaj Nagar Aurangabad

916-917.CA.9770.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9770 OF 2022 IN WP/11797/2018 RANGNATH NIVRUTTI LANDGE

VERSUS

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED BAJAJ NAGAR AURANGABAD ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Nitin L. Dhobale Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Lalit B. Deshmukh ...

AND 917 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9771 OF 2022 IN WP/11781/2018 ARJUN VISHNU SOLANKE

VERSUS

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Nitin L. Dhobale Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Lalit B. Deshmukh ...

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 05.07.2022 PER COURT :

Heard both the sides. Leave is granted to correct the names of the respective applicant original respondent as mentioned in prayer clause (b) in both the applications.

2.

By virtue of prayer clause (c) the applicant has solicited an order to withdraw the amount with accrued interest which stands deposited by the petitioner employer in this Court.

1/2

916-917.CA.9770.22.odt 3.

It is pointed out that this Court has allowed similar applications for withdrawal by different workers. In Civil Application No.4924/2019 in Writ Petition No.11791/2018 with connected matters by the order dated 02.05.2019 the applicants therein were allowed to withdraw the amount by furnishing solvent surety to the extent of the amount withdrawn and by filing undertaking. The same course needs to be followed. 4.

The Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (c). The applicants are allowed to withdraw the money subject to furnishing a solvent surety and undertaking that they would bring back the money in case so ordered in future.

(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb 2/2