← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5353/2020disposed off

Osmanabad Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd Osmanabad Through General Manager v. Chandrakant Venkatrao Anandgaonkar

2025-04-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar6 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:10235 ( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 WRIT PETITION NO. 4627 OF 2020 OSMANABAD JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD TULJAPUR THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER JAGANNATH DATTATRAYA SADAPHULE 920 WRIT PETITION NO. 4629 OF 2020 OSMANABAD JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD TULJAPUR THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER SITARAM GUNDERAO JADHAV 921 WRIT PETITION NO. 4631 OF 2020 OSMANABAD JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD TULJAPUR THROUGH ITS MANGESH GANPATRAO AKADE 923 WRIT PETITION NO. 5332 OF 2020 SUBHASH SHAMRAO LANDGE

( 2 ) 924 WRIT PETITION NO. 5334 OF 2020 VILAS DATTOPANT INGOLE 925 WRIT PETITION NO. 5335 OF 2020 VISHNU KUNDLIK GAIKWAD 926 WRIT PETITION NO. 5336 OF 2020 CHANDRAKANT VASANT PATHRUDKAR 927 WRIT PETITION NO. 5337 OF 2020 SADASHIV MADHAVRAO BACHE

( 3 ) 928 WRIT PETITION NO. 5346 OF 2020 VENKATESH PANDURANG GOVARDHAN 929 WRIT PETITION NO. 5347 OF 2020 SUBHASH JEEVANDHAR DESHMANE 930 WRIT PETITION NO. 5348 OF 2020 ARVIND VAMANRAO PATIL 931 WRIT PETITION NO. 5349 OF 2020 VIJAYKUMAR VISHWANATH HANCHATE THROUGH LRS VAIBHAV VIJAYKUMAR HANCHATE AND ANOTHER

( 4 ) 932 WRIT PETITION NO. 5350 OF 2020 DATTATRAYA YEDBA WAKDE 933 WRIT PETITION NO. 5351 OF 2020 ASHWINI SHRIRANG PATHAK LRS OF DECEASED SHRIRANG DATTATRAYA PATHAK 934 WRIT PETITION NO. 5352 OF 2020 GANPATI BHAUSING RATHOD 935 WRIT PETITION NO. 5353 OF 2020 OSMANABAD JANTA SAHAKARI BANK LTD OSMANABAD THROUGH CHANDRAKANT VENKATRAO ANANDGAONKAR

( 5 ) 936 WRIT PETITION NO. 5354 OF 2020 PRABHAKAR DATTATRAYA DEVALKAR 937 WRIT PETITION NO. 5359 OF 2020 GORAKH SAMBAHJI KAMBLE 938 WRIT PETITION NO. 5360 OF 2020 SAVARMAL LALCHAND JOSHI 939 WRIT PETITION NO. 5361 OF 2020 VENKAT NAGNATH DEVKATE

( 6 ) 940 WRIT PETITION NO. 5362 OF 2020 DILIP SHESHRAO VISHWASE

CORAM

: PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.

DATE : 04.04.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Mr. A. N. Irpatgire, learned Advocate for the petitioner in all the matters, submits that the ULP complaints filed by the respective respondents (employees) has been disposed of and the instant petitions have become infructuous. He submits that he is filing a pursis to that effect during the course of the day.

2.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in all the writ petitions, the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous.

( PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. ) PRW