← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/4413/2022disposed off

Panjab Manik Bhise v. The State Co-Operative Election Authority M.S. Pune Through Its Secretary And Others

2022-05-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi2 pages

1 64-67.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4413 OF 2022 PANJAB MANIK BHISE

VERSUS

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY, M.S. PUNE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. S. K. Kadam ...

WRIT PETITION NO.4420 OF 2022 MURLI GOVIND AADMANE

VERSUS

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY M.S. PUNE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. S. K. Kadam Advocate for Respondent No.7 : Mr. A. S. Deshpande ...

WRIT PETITION NO.4421 OF 2022 NIVRUTTI SHIVDAS BHISE

VERSUS

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY M.S. PUNE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. S. K. Kadam ...

WRIT PETITION NO.4425 OF 2022

2 64-67.odt NARAYAN PANDHARI BHISE

VERSUS

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY M. S. PUNE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. V. H. Dighe ...

WRIT PETITION NO.4426 OF 2022 SHRI. SHIVAJI SURYAKANT WAYAL

VERSUS

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY M.S. PUNE THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kamlakar J. Suryawanshi AGP for Respondents - State : Mr. S. N. Kendre Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 : Mr. V. H. Dighe ...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.

DATE : 02nd MAY, 2022 PER COURT :

1.

The learned advocate for petitioners makes statement that since the elections are over, these petitions have become infructuous. 2.

The writ petitions are disposed off as infructuous. (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH